Blackhawks Trade Rumors: 5 Other Names Chicago Could Consider

Here are five other names the Blackhawks might consider adding at some point this year.

1. Rene Bourque, LW, Calgary Flames
Chicago fans are familiar with Bourque, and bringing him back isn’t a new idea. He’s a physical forward who likes to shoot the puck, and has five goals already this year. But Bourque, 29, has also been accused of being selfish with the puck; he has zero assists this year. He has 16 hits already, and could be a good physical fit in the Hawks top six.
Why? He hits and can score goals.
Why Not? His contract. Bourque has four more years with a cap number of $3.333M. If GM Stan Bowman’s work this summer is any indication, the Blackhawks believe enough in their organizational depth that they’re looking to rent veteran forwards until some of the kids in Rockford are ready.
The Deal: offer Calgary Bryan Bickell, Steve Montador, prospect Brian Connelly and a mid-round pick. They’re looking to start over in Calgary, so offering them a pick and three younger players might be enough for the Flames to pull the trigger. Montador’s inclusion would be

2. Jussi Jokinen, LW, Carolina Hurricanes
Carolina’s looking to make changes to a mix that appears to be broken, and Jokinen, 28, could become a popular commodity. He has nine points so far this year (three goals, six assists) but has missed some time because of injury. With a $3M cap hit, he would fit the Hawks need for a guy that can finish in the top six.
Why? Because he averages 4:15 per game in power play ice time and would be a legitimate improvement to the Hawks special teams.
Why Not? Cost might be the biggest concern here. Not only does Jokinen have two years left on his deal, but Carolina might want more than the Hawks are willing to move.
The Deal: Offer Carolina either Bickell or Viktor Stalberg, Connelly and a late-round pick. Does this feel like a lot for one player? Sure. But Brunette and Stalberg have failed to find a role in the Hawks’ lineup this year, and we’ve already discussed Connelly’s limited ceiling with the organization. Carolina gets a nice bounty for one player, and Chicago’s long-term plans aren’t negatively impacted.

3. Cody Franson, D, Toronto Maple Leafs
Franson, 24, is a big defenseman that has fallen out of the rotation, and favor, in Toronto. He was good in Nashville, however, and is still a big body (6’5, 215). With an $800k cap number in the final year of his deal, Franson has the potential to be a physical upgrade from Hjalmarsson and would be an offensive upgrade instantly; Hjalmarsson is a zero-impact player on the offensive end.
Why? Because he’s young, cheap and expendable in Toronto. And, with the remainder of the season to earn a new deal, he would be motivated.
Why Not? He hasn’t been effective when given a chance in Toronto, and could be another Cam Barker.
The Deal: If Pittsburgh could get a fourth round pick for Mark Letestu, a mid-round pick for Franson wouldn’t be out of the question. However, there would need to be a subsequent move to make space on the Blackhawks roster. And no, “just give them Stalberg” doesn’t work because the Blackhawks got Stalberg from Toronto.

4. Ray Whitney, LW, Phoenix Coyotes
Phoenix isn’t going anywhere, but it’s hard to imagine they would trade Keith Yandle or Shane Doan in an affordable deal the Hawks would consider. Whitney, 39, is in the final year of his contract (career?), and his having a fantastic season. He has 14 points (six goals, eight assists) through Tuesday, and is handling top-six minutes (18:11 ATOI) for the Coyotes.
Why? Because he’s everything the Blackhawks wanted when they signed Brunette, but he might be able to do that job better.
Why Not? Great question. His $3M cap hit is affordable for the Hawks under the cap right now, and the Coyotes might be looking for a mid-level prospect or mid-round pick in return. Age would be the primary concern with Whitney, and he wouldn’t be a physical improvement up front.
The Deal: Offer Phoenix Stalberg and Connelly. Connelly has been an AHL All-Star, but doesn’t appear to be in the Hawks’ long-term plans. The Coyotes might be able to use a puck-moving defenseman, though.

5. Brian Rolston, LW, New York Islanders
One of the most hated pieces of paper in New York, Rolston has actually had a decent start to the 2011-12 season. Rolston, 38, is playing over 15 minutes per game and has three points (one goal, two assists) in 11 games. However, the 6’2, 210-pound forward has 12 hits, more than Hjalmarsson, and is averaging 2:48 in power play ice time per night.
Why? Because the Islanders might be willing to take bad paper back from the Blackhawks (Olesz?) if they can get Rolston off their books. He’s also a physical veteran in the final year of his contract.
Why Not? Because his cap hit is huge (just over $5M), and he projects more as a third or fourth line forward in Chicago.
The Deal: Offer the Islanders Olesz and Connelly. Why part ways with a talented young defenseman? Because that’s the sweetener that, hopefully, convinces the Islanders to take the two additional years of Olesz’s deal off our books.

This entry was posted in 2011-12 Blackhawks and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Blackhawks Trade Rumors: 5 Other Names Chicago Could Consider

  1. boom-boom says:

    Instead of Bourque off the Calgary roster, how about Jerome Iginla?? The Flames aren’t going to be contenders for a while and he’s not getting any younger, so maybe they send him to a team with a chance to win his last few years. Depending on who you give up/send down(Olesz), he can work under the cap. The only problem is that Iginla will eat up the majority of the cap space available going into next season, the last year of his deal.

  2. ivan says:

    Iginla – Toews – Kane

    sick.

    the economics don’t really work. next season though, if Calgary hasn’t become a playoff team he is going to go for a boatload at the trade deadline.

  3. Tab Bamford says:

    Why does the idea make you nuts?

    1) Iginla’s cap hit is too big. This year and next.
    2) The Blackhawks won’t mortgage their future to make a deal for Iginla. Is one of the Hawks’ top prospects worth Iginla? Yes. But it would take more than one in addition to an NHL player making at least $3.5M (you can look at who’s making that much on the roster) to make any deal happen.

    Unless Calgary is stupid, and would take Hjalmarsson and two mid-level prospects, Iginla won’t be a Blackhawk any time soon.

  4. Cody says:

    Tab, don’t you think the ‘Hawks would be overpaying if they made the deal you proposed for Bourque, who is one of the more streaky scorers in the NHL? The ‘Hawks would be giving up: one of the best value players in the NHL, a blueliner they have locked up long-term and have no replacement for at this point in time, what could be considered by some teams as a valuable prospect and a draft pick… I wouldn’t make that deal unless I’m getting more in return if I’m Bowman.

    Jussi Jokinen is a good idea and the deal you proposed seems very realisitic.

    I’ve always liked Cody Franson and his game. I’d love it if the ‘Hawks could make a deal for him and give him an opportunity on their blueline. Unfortunately it looks like Burke is going to dangle him on a string and make a team overpay for him.

    Ray Whitney is an interesting idea but I’m still holding out for Shane Doan.

    I never, ever want to see Rolston in a ‘Hawks uniform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>