Buying Out Brian Campbell Could Save the Blackhawks

Brian Campbell might need to leave town for the Hawks to win the Cup.

Brian Campbell might need to leave town for the Hawks to win the Cup.

There are lots of rumors flying around the Blackhawks right now, and most of them have to do with potential player movement. However, while some rumors center around improving the team for a run at the Stanley Cup this year, most of them are the work of mad scientists/hockey writers that are trying to make all of the current Hawks fit into the salary cap next year.

The latest rumor is that the Blackhawks will announce, at some point during the upcoming circus trip, that they have agreed to long-term deals with their two young stars, Patrick Kane and captain Jonathan Toews. As Pierre LaBrun postulates on ESPN.com, any fair market contracts for these two would almost certainly mean there isn’t enough cap space in Chicago for Duncan Keith.

Keith is the rock of the Hawks’ blue line, and must be retained. But considering what other top defenseman are making (Kaberle is at $4.25M, Zdeno Chara is at $7.5M, Brian Campbell is at $7.14M), Keith is going to get a substantial raise from his current salary of $1.9M.

Assuming Keith’s cap number jumps to fair market value, which should be in the neighborhood of $5M in the current economy, the Blackhawks unfortunately have too much money on their books to afford him. So how can the Hawks come up with enough cap space to keep Toews, Kane and Keith? I did some research, and the solution is simple.

Buy out Brian Campbell’s contract.

My homework on the current Collective Bargaining Agreement between the NHLPA and the NHL left me with an optimistic view of how the Hawks could easily afford to keep their home-grown core intact. Keith isn’t the only player that is going to need a raise, and unloading Campbell could serve as the first domino to facilitate the rest of the roster being set.

Duncan Keith needs to stay in Chicago.

Duncan Keith needs to stay in Chicago.

Based on the current CBA, there is a formula by which the annual salary cap hit for a player is determined if their contract is bought out before it expires. I’m going to try to break down the CBA’s policy on contract buyouts to a Cliff Notes version for the sake of discussing how the Hawks buying out Campbell could help them afford the rest of their roster.

If a player is older than 26, then the player is entitled to 60 percent of the remaining dollar value of their contract. However, the CBA allows a club to stretch that 60 percent out over twice the remaining duration of the existing contract.

Campbell is due $42.84 million over the next six years ($7.14 million per). So, in Campbell’s case, his new “contract” for the Hawks’ cap purposes would become $25.71 million over the next 12 seasons (or $2.14 million per season).

In buying out Campbell, the Hawks would lose a good power play quarterback and one of the fastest skating blue liners in the league. But they would save $5M annually.

Circling back to our discussion about Keith’s relative value in this market, the $5M the Hawks would save would basically become Keith’s contract.

Something the Hawks have undoubtedly already dealt with internally is that Campbell’s contract is concrete; no other team is going to trade for that size of a cap number without unloading dead weight of their own. So an internal restructuring of their salaries is needed, which makes buying Campbell out a realistic option.

The negatives of buying out a contract as long as Campbell’s are obvious: the Hawks lose a good player and have to pay someone who isn’t on their roster for 12 years. But the global impact of taking Campbell off the books could reach beyond just Keith.

After the 2009-10 season, there are more players looking for new paper than just the headliners. Toews, Kane and Keith could be joined as restricted free agents by Andrew Ladd, Ben Eager, Colin Fraser, Niklas Hjalmarsson and Jordan Hendry.

Hjalmarsson

The Hawks need to keep Niklas Hjalmarsson, too.

From this group, Hjalmarsson stands out as a priority to re-sign. It would be prudent for the Hawks to give him a long-term deal with Keith this summer, locking up a player that Scotty Bowman has projected as one of the top defensemen in the league.

Locking up Keith and Hjalmarsson is impossible with Campbell’s contract on the books. If Campbell’s no longer with the team, it’s at least within a reasonable imagination that both could be retained.

Another unfortunate reality is that there are deals coming up in subsequent years that will require the Hawks to spend a significant amount of money again. Brent Seabrook is a restricted free agent in the summer of 2011, and he’ll require a nice raise just like Hjalmarsson and Keith will.

When Seabrook is looking for a new deal, though, Brent Sopel’s $2.3M cap number will be off the books, affording the Hawks additional flexibility. Other contracts that expire after the 2010-11 season include Dustin Byfuglien and Troy Brouwer.

With Cam Barker under contract for the next two years for less than half Campbell’s cap number, and prospects like Shawn LaLonde and Dylan Olsen coming up through the system, eventually Campbell’s roster spot would be needed for a cheaper, younger player as well.

Though Barker, like Campbell, leaves a lot to be desired on the ice, his heavy shot from the point makes Campbell’s niche on the roster less exclusive. Considering that former-defenseman Byfuglien has seen time at the point on the power play recently further dillutes the Hawks’ need for Campbell’s ability to lead a rush.

Stan Bowman inherited a minor league system full of solid prospects. Players like LaLonde, Olsen, Akim Aliu, Jake Dowell and Kyle Beach could all find their names on lockers at the United Center in the next couple years, and they’ll arrive with significantly lower cap numbers than some veterans that are currently on the roster.

By buying out Campbell’s contract, Stan Bowman would release $5M of pressure between the young Hawks and the salary cap, enabling him to use Dale Tallon as a crutch for eating over $2M but opening the space needed to keep a great young core together for more than one run at a Stanley Cup.

Hawks

This entry was posted in Here come the Hawks... and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Buying Out Brian Campbell Could Save the Blackhawks

  1. Daniel Hogan says:

    First of all, I have to compliment you on this site. A friend of mine recently found it and sent me the link. You clearly know the team extremely well, and from what I have read, I tend to agree with all your posts.

    I absolutely agree with your assessment of Hjalmarsson. As a matter of fact, as I was reading the sentence with the list of upcoming restricted free agents, I had the same exact thought.

    Just throwing my two cents in regarding Cam Barker:

    Big guys take a while to develop. Heck, defensemen in general take a while to develop. I’m curious to see how he comes along over the next few seasons. After all, he is only 23. He was drafted third overall (behind Ovechkin and Malkin). I know that comes with a grain of salt; lots of high picks have been busts. Still, I’d hate to see him go somewhere else and develop into a solid top pair blue liner, and have it come back to bite the ‘Hawks.

    Just a thought.

    Keep up the good work!

  2. Daniel Hogan says:

    Afterthought:

    If the Blackhawks weren’t able to resign Keith, I was all set to refer to Campbell as “The Albatross” every time he touched the puck. LOL!

  3. Daniel Hogan says:

    Afterthought:

    If the ‘Hawks weren’t able to resign Keith, I was all set to start referring to Campbell as “The Albatross” every time he touched the puck. LOL!

  4. Tab Bamford says:

    Thanks for the compliments, Mr. Hogan. I appreciate it!

    I agree with you that Barker was a high draft pick and that d-men take a bit longer to develop.

    But the great thing about the Hawks system as a whole is that they’re stocked with some good, young talent that might be ready to come along.

    The bad part of the Hawks organization is that the NHL roster has some albatross” contracts that are now putting strain on the overall team.

    So there needs to be a medium. Good luck, Stan Bowman!

    Because of the presence of a couple young kids that were also fairly high draft picks, Dylan Olsen and Shawn LaLonde, someone like Barker might be worth taking a risk that’s peaked.

    When you have as much talent as the Hawks do, there are going to be players (Craig Anderson) that go somewhere else and succeed more than you thought they could (Tuomo Ruutu). But if the goal is winning the Cup, the key is to maintain focus on putting together a team that works well on the ice that fits under the cap.

    If Barker, or Byfuglien or Ladd, becomes a piece that’s necessarily moved to make room under the cap because a young guy like Olsen, LaLonde or even Beach and Aliu come up and adequately fill that role for cheap, it’s gotta happen.

    The point of this piece is that Campbell does have albatross contract that, if it isn’t traded, could benefit the team in the immediate future by being minimized via a buy out.

    Thanks for the comments, Daniel!

  5. Pingback: Should the Blackhawks Buyout Cristobal Huet? | Committed Indians

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>