Why Jonathan Toews is More Valuable Than Steven Stamkos

As he continues to build momentum towards the Hart Memorial Trophy, the talking heads have started to analyze how Jonathan Toews compares to some of the game’s other elite players.

Today, in the second part of a series comparing Toews to other potential Hart finalists, we’ll look at why Toews is more valuable than another MVP candidate: Tampa Bay’s Steven Stamkos.

To change things up from when we compared Toews to Daniel and Henrik Sedin, we’re going to make two tweaks to our method of comparing.

First, we’re going to eliminate goals and total points. It’s a well-known fact that Stamkos is running away with the league-lead in goals this year. We’re also going to eliminate total points from the discussion at the outset.

Secondly, we’re going to remove the player names from the statistics we present to remove any presumption of player quality before looking at the stats.

With those two concessions in mind, here are the numbers:

  Player A Player B
GP 68 70
ATOI 20:39 20:21
 +/- 25 6
A 41 43
GW 7 7
Total FO 1360 805
FO% 57.4 46.8
PP ATOI 3:09 4:40
PP G 10 17
SH ATOI 1:59 0:22
Takeaways 82 34
PIM 20 68

Let’s break these down quickly.

In a number of categories, these two players are nearly identical: games played, average ice time, assists and game-winning goals.

When you place the power play goal differential into the context of power play ice time, the two players aren’t incredibly different either.

Beyond those numbers, though, the comparison is heavily weighted in favor of Player A.

Both of these players is the top line center for their given teams, but Player A has taken 69 percent more draws and is winning more than 10 percent more faceoffs. That’s a substantial margin.

The two numbers that are direct indications of defensive play are also heavily weighed towards Player A. One of these two players is a primary penalty killer and is among the league leaders in takeaways, while the other isn’t a factor defensively on special teams and has less than half as many takeaways. Player A also has less than half as many penalty minutes as Player B.

Again, all of these numbers are indications of an obvious difference in the complete game brought to the ice each night.

Which skater is which?

Player A is Toews.

Player B is Stamkos.

Now let’s take one final piece and add it to the mix.

Toews has 71 points;Stamkos has 86.

The reason I bring these numbers into play now is to point out perhaps the most striking difference in play. Toews’ plus-minus blows away the number being posted by Stamkos. Furthermore, when you consider that Stamkos has scored 15 additional points, the 19-point difference in plus-minus is astronomical.

This analysis shows that goal scoring isn’t everything, and should provide painfully clear testimony to a very simple fact: Jonathan Toews deserves the Hart Memorial Trophy more than Steven Stamkos.

This entry was posted in 2010-11 Blackhawks and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why Jonathan Toews is More Valuable Than Steven Stamkos

  1. Steve says:

    I couldn’t agree more… Especially when you consider the number of games played, and how Toews had a slower start to the season. I would like to see the exact same comparison made on these two players, and throw in Sedin, since the Allstar break. I am willing to bet the numbers would be even more telling.

  2. Vcityboy says:

    This comparaison is bogus. You left out the goals which make a huge difference. Also you have to look at the teams as well for a fair comparison. Tampa bays two goalies combined had the wirst save percentage in the league while Chicago’s defense if far more superior and have better goalies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>